LES RÉPERCUSSIONS DE LA RECONNAISSANCE PROFESSIONNELLE SUR LES INFIRMIèRES ET LES INFIRMIERS AUTORISéS EN SOINS PéRIOPéRATOIRES : UNE ENQUêTE DESCRIPTIVE QUALITATIVE

Authors

  • Kathryn Schroeter
  • Michelle Byrne
  • Katharine Klink
  • Matthew Beier
  • Natalie McAndrew

Abstract

As the practice of healthcare becomes more technologically advanced, specialized and complex, there is an increasing demand for accountability. Certification demonstrates that an individual practitioner has maintained an acceptable, or perhaps more advanced level of qualifications, knowledge, and skills in a specialty practice area.

The nurses’ perceptions, as shared in this study, revealed positive aspects related to their achievement of certification in perioperative practice.

Although certification for nurses has been available for decades a detailed evaluation of its meaning and implications for practice seems to be unavailable. The purpose of this qualitative study, conducted in Chicago, Illinois and also online, was to describe the perceptions of perioperative nurses as related to the impact that certification has had on both their professional practice and on a personal level. A qualitative survey design was used for this study. A purposive sample (N = 149) was obtained from board certified perioperative specialty nurses.

Thematic analysis was used to explain the nurses’ perceptions. Thematic analysis involves searching through data, in this case the narrative responses to the survey, to identify any recurrent patterns. A theme is a cluster of linked categories conveying similar meanings and usually emerges through the inductive analytic process. Themes that emerged from the data were categorized

into two groups -- impact on professional practice and personal impact. The primary theme that emerged related to respondents’ personal perspectives was pride in accomplishment or achievement and increased confidence. The theme that described professional impact was credibility. Some themes, such as knowledge, confidence, and opportunity, overlapped both groups.

The nurses’ perceptions, as shared in this study, revealed positive aspects related to their achievement of certification in perioperative practice. The findings of this research expand knowledge about how certification impacts on the nurses’ personal and professional experiences.

Author Biographies

Kathryn Schroeter

Kathryn Schroeter, PhD, RN, CNOR, is Assistant Professor College of Nursing, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, and Primary Investigator for this research study.

Michelle Byrne

Michelle M. Byrne, PhD, RN, CNOR, is Professor and MS Nursing Education Program Coordinator,
North Georgia College & State University - Dept. of Nursing, and Co-Primary Investigator for this research study.

Katharine Klink

Katharine A. Klink, MSN, RN, is Clinical Assistant Professor at Carroll University and was responsible for Data Analysis and Literature review for this study.

Matthew Beier

Matthew Beier, MS, RN, CNS-BC, CNOR, is Manager of Surgical Services, Aurora Medical Center - Grafton, WI, and responsible for Data Analysis for this study.

Natalie McAndrew

Natalie S. McAndrew, MSN, RN, CCRN, CNS, is CNS – Cardiovascular ICU, Froedtert Hospital/Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, and responsible for Data Analysis for this study.

References

Personal communication with CCI staff. 1/28/2011.

Canadian Nurses Association. Updated May 28, 2012. Retrieved May 29,2012 from http://www. cna-aiic.ca/en/ professional- development/specialty-certification/ what-is-certification/ statistics/and http://www.cna-aiic.ca/en/ professional-development/ specialty-certification/what-is- certification/

American Association of Critical- Care Nurses 2003. Safeguarding the patient and the profession: the value of critical care nurse certification. American Journal of Critical Care, 12(2), 154-164.

American Board of Nursing Specialties 2005. Promoting excellence in nursing certification from the American Board of Nursing Specialties: A position statement on the value of specialty nursing certification. Viewpoint, September/October,10.

Briggs, L. A., Brown, H., Kesten, K., & Heath, J. 2006. Certification a benchmark for critical care nursing excellence. Critical Care Nurse, 26(6), 47-54.

Gaberson, K. B., Schroeter, K., Killen, A. R., & Valentine, W. A. 2003. The perceived value of certification by certified perioperative nurses. Nursing Outlook, 51, 272-276.

Frank-Stromborg, M., Ward, S., Hughes, L., Brown, K., Coleman, A., Grindel, C. G., et al. 2002. Does certification status of oncology nurses make a difference in patient outcomes? Oncology Nursing Forum, 4, 665-672.

Fitzpatrick, M. A. 2003. Certified practice: We owe it to our patients and ourselves. Nursing Management, March, 6.

Desilets, L. D. 2007. Nursing professional development certification. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 38, 12-13.

Collins, S. E. 2006. Specialty certification in nursing: A hallmark of excellence. The Pennsylvania Nurse, March, 5.

National League for Nursing (NLN). 2012. Certified Nurse Educator (CNE) 2012 Candidate Handbook pg. 3.

Trossman, S. 2002. What do credentials mean to you? Nurses talk about the value of ANCC certification. Nevada RNformation, 11(3), 31.

Cary, A. H. 2001. Certified registered nurses: Results of the study of the certified workforce.

American Journal of Nursing, 101, at http://www.nurse 44-52. credentialing.org/Magnet/

Application%20Process/ 14. Cliff, B., & Martinez, J. 2004. Download-Tools.aspx.

Value of nursing certification.

Journal of Hospice and Palliative 23. Weeks, S. K., Ross, A., & Roberts, Nursing, 6(3), 191-192. P. L. 2006. Certification and

magnet hospitals. American

Wade, C. H. 2009. Perceived Journal of Nursing, 106(7), 74-76.

effects of specialty nurse

certification: A review of the 24. Piazza, I. M., Griffin, M. Q., literature. Association of Donahue, M., Fitzpatrick, J. J., & Perioperative Registered Nurses Dykes, P. C. 2006. Differences in Journal, 89, 183-192. perceptions of empowerment

among nationally certified and

Stromborg, M. F., Niebuhr, B., noncertified nurses. The Journal of

Prevost, S., Fabrey, L., Muenzen, Nursing Administration, 36(5),

P., Spence, C., et al. 2005. 277-283.

Specialty certification more than a

title. Nursing Management, May, 25. Wynd, C. A. 2003. Current factors 36-46. contributing to professionalism in

nursing. Journal of Professional 17. Newhouse, R. P., Johantgen, M., Nursing, 19(5), 251-261.

Pronovost, P. J., & Johnson, E.

Perioperative nurses and 26. Mlinar, S., Tusak, M., Karpljuk, D. patient outcomes-Mortality, (2009). Self-concept in intensive complications, and lengths of stay. care nurses control group women. AORN Journal, 81(3), 508-528. Nursing Ethics, 16(3), 328-339.

Kendall-Gallagher, D., & Blegen, 27. Ohlen, J. 1998. The professional M. A. 2009. Competence and identity of the nurse: concept certification of registered nurses analysis and development. Journal and safety of patients in intensive of Advanced Nursing, 28(4), 720- care units. American Journal of 727.

Critical Care, 18(2), 106-116.

Puddifoot, J. 1997. Psychological 19. Prowant, B. F., Niebuhr, B., & Biel, reaction to perceived erasure of

M. 2007. Perceived value of community boundaries. The nursing certification-Summary of a Journal of Social Psychology, national survey. Nephrology 137(3), 343-355.

Nursing Journal, 34(4), 399-402.

Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. 1986. The 20. Niebuhr, B., & Biel, M. 2007. The social identity theory of group

value of specialty nursing behavior. In S.Worchel & W. certification. Nursing Outlook, 55, Austin (Eds.) Psychology of 176-181. intergroup relations(pp 7-24).

Chicago: Nelson Hall.

Sechrist, K. R., Valentine, W., &

Berlin, L. E. 2006. Perceived value 30. Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. 2009. of certification among certified, The practice of nursing research: noncertified, and administrative Conduct, critique, and perioperative nurses. Journal of utilization (6th ed.).. Philadelphia: Professional Nursing, 22(4), 242- Saunders Elsevier.

ORNAC JOURNAL • September 2012 • www.ORNAC.ca

Magnet Recognition Program – Download Tools. Accessed 5/1/12

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications

Downloads

Published

2012-09-01

How to Cite

Schroeter, K., Byrne, M., Klink, K., Beier, M., & McAndrew, N. (2012). LES RÉPERCUSSIONS DE LA RECONNAISSANCE PROFESSIONNELLE SUR LES INFIRMIèRES ET LES INFIRMIERS AUTORISéS EN SOINS PéRIOPéRATOIRES : UNE ENQUêTE DESCRIPTIVE QUALITATIVE. Operating Room Nurses Association of Canada Journal, 30(3). Retrieved from https://ornacjournal.ca/index.php/ornac/article/view/12323