Evaluation of the Surgical Tray Opening Procedure in Operating Suites: Systematic Review and Recommendations
Keywords:
operating room tray, surgical tray opening, surgical trayAbstract
Introduction: Optimizing the processes involved in managing operating suite activities is an essential element in obtaining gains in efficiency. The early opening of surgical trays could represent an innovative practice for reducing operating times and wait periods between surgeries as well as for increasing the number of daily surgeries. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the risks and benefits of introducing this practice in the operating room.
Methodology: A systematic literature review was conducted in various indexed databases as well as in the grey literature in order to identify synthesis studies, clinical guidelines and randomized and non-randomized studies on the impact of opening surgical trays early. The following indicators were sought: time lapse between the patient’s entrance and the beginning of surgery, the frequency of surgical tray contamination, and the rate of surgical wound infection.
Results: An original study and four practice guides were included after a quality assessment. No studies on efficiency gains associated with the early opening of surgical trays were found. The results of the experimental study suggest that the contamination rate for uncovered surgical trays is low for the first 30 minutes (4%) and increases over time with exposure to the ambient air. Most clinical guidelines recommend preparing the surgical instruments as close to the beginning of surgery as possible without specifying the minimum time interval to be respected as well as whether or not the patient is in the operating room.
Discussion: The analysis of all the available data does not make it possible to determine the optimal moment for opening the surgical trays. Given the uncertainty regarding the risks of infection, and the lack of data on the associated benefits, the decision to opt for a change in practice in the opening of surgical trays should be based on a range of factors. An assessment of the data therefore suggests caution and that a feasibility analysis, including a review of all processes and parameters for managing the risks associated with the early opening of surgical trays, be conducted before initiating any changes in the institutions where a change of practice is being sought.
References
Institut National de Santé Publique
du Québec. La prévention des
infections du site opératoire -
Synthesis document. Government of
Quebec, 2014, 25 pages.
Canadian Campaign: Safer
Healthcare Now! Getting Started
Kit: Surgical Site Infection (SSI).
, 171 pages.
NICE. Surgical site infections:
prevention and treatment. NICE
guidelines CG74. 2008.
Auerbach, A. Prevention of Surgical
Site Infections. Making Health Care
Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient
Safety Practices, Evidence Report/
Technology Assessment, No. 43,
Shojania K., Duncan, B., McDonnald
K. et al., eds., Rockville, MD:
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality; 2001: 221-44.
Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL,
Wilkinson WE, Sexton DJ. The
impact of surgical-site infections in
the 1990s: attributable mortality,
excess length of hospitalization, and
extra costs. Infection control and
hospital epidemiology: Official
journal of the Society of Hospital
Epidemiologists of America.
;20(11):725-30.
Cheadle WG. Risk factors for
surgical site infection. Surgical
Infections. 2006;7 Suppl 1:S7-11.
Unité d’évaluation des technologies
et des modes d’intervention en santé
(UETMIS) Évaluation de la procédure
d'ouverture des plateaux chirurgicaux
dans les blocs opératoires des
hôpitaux du CHU de Québec-
Université Laval (Evaluation Report
-15). 2015:41.
Kung J, Chiappelli F, Cajulis OO,
Avezova R, Kossan G, Chew L, et al.
From Systematic Reviews to Clinical
Recommendations for Evidence-
Based Health Care: Validation of
Revised Assessment of Multiple
Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR)
for Grading of Clinical Relevance.
The Open Dentistry Journal.
;4:84-91.
Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman
GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G,
et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline
development, reporting and
evaluation in health care. CMAJ:
Canadian Medical Association
Journal. 2010;182(18):E839-42.
Unité d’évaluation des technologies
et des modes d’intervention en santé
(UETMIS). Guide méthodologique :
démarche d'évaluation et étapes de
réalisation d'un projet d'ETMIS,
UETMIS of the CHU de Québec-
Université Laval. 2015:26.
Dalstrom DJ, Venkatarayappa I,
Manternach AL, Palcic MS, Heyse
BA, Prayson MJ. Time-dependent
contamination of opened sterile
operating-room trays. The Journal
of Bone and Joint Surgery. American
volume. 2008; 90(5):1022-5.
Association of Perioperative
Registered Nurses (AORN).
Guideline for Sterile Technique.
Guidelines for Perioperative
Practice.
Operating Room Nurses
Association of Canada / Association
des infirmières et infirmiers de salle
d'opération du Canada. The
ORNAC Standards for
Perioperative Registered Nursing
Practice, 12th edition, October 2015.
Association of Surgical
Technologists. AST Standards of
Practice for Creating the Sterile
Field. 2011. Accessed online on
August 6, 2015. http://www.ast.org/
uploadedFiles/Main_Site/Content/
About_Us/Standard_Creating_
Sterile_Field.pdf.
Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson
ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline
for Prevention of Surgical Site
Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC)
Hospital Infection Control Practices
Advisory Committee. American
Journal of Infection Control.
;27(2):97-132; quiz 3-4;
discussion 96.
Edmiston C, Sinski S, Seabrook G,
Simons D, Goheen M. Airborne
Particulates in the OR Environment.
AORN Journal. 1999;69(6):1169-,
-2, 75-7 passim.
Howard JL, Hanssen AD. Principles
of a Clean Operating Room
Environment. The Journal of
Arthroplasty. 2007;22(7 Suppl 3):6 11.
Letts RM, Doermer E. Conversation
in the Operating Theater as a Cause
of Airborne Bacterial Contamination.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
American volume. 1983;65(3):357-62.
Parikh SN, Grice SS, Schnell BM,
Salisbury SR. Operating room
traffic: is there any role of
monitoring it? Journal of Pediatric
Orthopedics. 2010;30(6):617-23.
Ritter MA. Operating room
environment. Clinical Orthopaedics
and Related Research.
(369):103-9.
Ritter MA, Eitzen H, French ML,
Hart JB. The operating room
environment as affected by people
and the surgical face mask. Clinical
Orthopaedics and Related Research.
(111):147-50.
Alberta Health Service: Surgical
Aseptic Technique and Sterile Field.
Guideline for asepsis for invasive
surgical procedures conducted in
Community-based Health Care
Settings.
Accreditation Canada: Perioperative
Services and Invasive Procedures
Standards (for visits starting after
January 1, 2015). 2014.
Thiele RH, Huffmyer JL, Nemergut
EC. The "six sigma approach" to
the operating room environment
and infection. Best Practice &
Research Clinical Anaesthesiology.
;22(3):537-52.
Torossian A, Brauer A, Hocker J,
Bein B, Wulf H, Horn EP. Preventing
Inadvertent Perioperative
Hypothermia. Deutsches Arzteblatt
International 2015; 112(10): 166-72.
